Conga CPQProposals & Contracts
vs
IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Conga CPQ vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Icertis is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ.
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 40% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Choose Icertis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CPQ | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #44 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CPQ 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Icertis leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Conga CPQIcertis
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Conga CPQ ranked higher
0Icertis ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CPQ | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application | Public or private cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Founded | 2006 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise buyers | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CPQ vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-cpq-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.