Conga CPQ vs Loopio
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loopio is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 6 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 46% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Choose Loopio if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6 vs 0.3)
- You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
- Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CPQ | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #44 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 12 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 46% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CPQ 0pp · Loopio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loopio leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Conga CPQ | Loopio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #12 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CPQ | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application | Cloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant |
| Support | — | Onboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app support |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas | Toronto, Canada |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Strategic investment from Sumeru Equity Partners |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise buyers | Proposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires. |
Plans side by side
Conga CPQ
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Loopio
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
- Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
- Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CPQ vs Loopio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-cpq-vs-loopio, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.