Skip to content
SlateIndex
ContentsquareAI-first experience platform for every human and agent journey
vs
UmamiOpen-source web and product analytics
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2

Contentsquare vs Umami

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Umami is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 8.4 versus 6.7 for Contentsquare, and ranks ahead in 33% of the answers that name both.

Choose Contentsquare if…

  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 9001:2015 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
  • Session replay and UX friction insights

Choose Umami if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.4 vs 6.7)
  • You want a lower entry price ($20 vs $49)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 33% positive)
  • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Contentsquare Umami
Visibility score6.7%8.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Web Analytics#14#11
Share of voice2.5%2.3%
Mentions this run1312
Positive in AI answers33%67%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Contentsquare 7%

Contentsquare 0pp · Umami 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Umami leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
10.4%
13.9%
AI Mode
3.3%
4.1%
Perplexity
6.3%
7.2%
ContentsquareUmami

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

2Contentsquare ranked higher
1Umami ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionContentsquareUmami
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $49 / moFree; paid from $20 / mo
Free planYesYes
Deployment—Self-hosted on your own infrastructure or as Umami Cloud, with US and EU regions
Integrations115+—
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 9001:2015—
SupportAI-powered support on the Free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Dedicated support and SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer success manager on EnterpriseCommunity support, Email support, Email and chat support, Uptime SLA, onboarding assistance and designated support engineer on Enterprise
Founded20122022
HeadquartersParis, FranceSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees1,001–5,0001–10
FundingSeries FPre-seed · $2M raised
Best forDigital teams at large enterprise and mid-market brands that want to understand and improve journeys across web and apps. The Free plan suits first-time users, and Enterprise suits large teams.Developers, marketers, agencies, startups and teams that want privacy-first analytics without a cookie banner

Plans side by side

Contentsquare

Free$0forever (up to 200k monthly sessions)
Growth$49month (from 7k monthly sessions; $39/month billed yearly)
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Contentsquare pricing

Umami

Hobby$0month
Pro$20month
Business$200month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Umami pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Contentsquare

  • Automatic event capture (autocapture) with no manual tagging
  • Session replay and UX friction insights
  • Strong G2 rating from many reviews
  • Recognised market leader in digital experience analytics
  • Free tier available for small projects
  • Paid plans require custom quotes rather than transparent pricing

Umami

  • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics
  • Free hosted tier or free self-hosted option
  • Affordable and reliable web analytics
  • Simple to use for everyday traffic reporting
  • Strong choice for self-hosting and control

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contentsquare vs Umami”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contentsquare-vs-umami, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.