Skip to content
SlateIndex
HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
vs
HotjarHotjar is now Contentsquare: heatmaps, recordings and surveys.
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3

Heap vs Hotjar

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Heap is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 36.1 versus 2.2 for Hotjar, and ranks ahead in 33% of the answers that name both.

Choose Heap if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (36.1 vs 2.2)
  • You need more native integrations (100+ vs 10+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (15% vs 6% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage

Choose Hotjar if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
  • Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
  • Basic free tier or trial available

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Heap Hotjar
Visibility score36.1%2.2%
Change vs last weekup+9.1%up+0.8%
Rank in Product Analytics#4#16
Share of voice11.1%0.7%
Mentions this run523
Positive in AI answers15%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Heap 36%

Heap +9.100000000000001pp · Hotjar +0.8000000000000003pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43%
3.5%
AI Mode
31.3%
3.1%
Perplexity
34.1%
0%
HeapHotjar

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

1Heap ranked higher
2Hotjar ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionHeapHotjar
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $39 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site—
Integrations100+10+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, SOC 2 Type 2
SupportEmail support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap CommunityAI-powered support on the free plan, Priority support on Pro and Enterprise, Community, Education
FundingSeries D · $205M raised—
Best forProduct and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event taggingMidsize and SMB businesses that want heatmaps, session recordings and surveys in one product experience platform.

Plans side by side

Heap

Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Heap pricing

Hotjar

Free$0forever
Growth$39month, billed yearly ($49 billed monthly); from 7k monthly sessions
ProCustomcustom
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Hotjar pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Heap

  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)
  • Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
  • Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
  • Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
  • Free tier available
  • Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
  • Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions

Hotjar

  • Session replay and heatmaps for behavior analysis
  • Combines visual behavior with quantitative and feedback data
  • Basic free tier or trial available

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heap vs Hotjar”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heap-vs-hotjar, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.