Skip to content
SlateIndex
HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
vs
IntercomThe only helpdesk designed for the AI Agent era
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3

HubSpot vs Intercom

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Intercom is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 46.2 versus 33.1 for HubSpot, and ranks ahead in 74% of the answers that name both.

Choose HubSpot if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 450+)
  • You need SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose Intercom if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (46.2 vs 33.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 35% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 or ISO 27701 or AIUC-1 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • AI-first customer support with the Fin AI agent

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric HubSpot Intercom
Visibility score33.1%46.2%
Change vs last weekdown−3.8%up+2%
Rank in Live Chat & AI Support#4#2
Share of voice9.5%10.1%
Mentions this run4548
Positive in AI answers35%41%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3HubSpot 33%

HubSpot −3.8999999999999986pp · Intercom +1.9000000000000057pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Intercom leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
35.6%
61.1%
AI Mode
33.3%
41.5%
Perplexity
30.6%
36.1%
HubSpotIntercom

Head to head in AI answers

31 engine answers name both brands

8HubSpot ranked higher
23Intercom ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionHubSpotIntercom
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $7 per seat / mo$29 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo · 14-day trial
Onboarding fee$3,000—
DeploymentCloudCloud (SaaS), with US, EU and AU data hosting
Integrations2000+450+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, SOC 3SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 27701, AIUC-1, GDPR, CCPA
SupportPhone—
Founded20062011
HeadquartersCambridge, Massachusetts, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
Employees5,000+1,001–5,000
FundingCorporate roundDebt financing · $242M raised
Best forStartups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM.Support teams from startups to large enterprises that want AI-first customer service with human agents and an AI agent in one system

Plans side by side

HubSpot

Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
HubSpot pricing

Intercom

Essential$29seat/mo
Advanced$85seat/mo
Expert$132seat/mo
Fin AI Agent (with existing helpdesk)$0.99Fin outcome
Intercom pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

HubSpot

  • intuitive, user-friendly interface
  • generous free tier
  • all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
  • tight CRM integration for live chat and service
  • good fit for startups and small businesses
  • higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
  • higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans

Intercom

  • AI-first customer support with the Fin AI agent
  • Strong for in-app messaging and product-led SaaS
  • Unified conversation history for smooth handoffs to humans
  • Lower per-seat cost when billed annually
  • Praised as the best overall chat and AI experience
  • Per-seat and usage-based AI charges can add up in cost

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs Intercom”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-intercom, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.