Keap vs Less Annoying CRM
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Less Annoying CRM is the stronger AI pick in CRM: it has a visibility score of 5 versus 0.8 for Keap, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keap if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
- Lower effective monthly cost when paying annually
Choose Less Annoying CRM if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5 vs 0.8)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $299)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 25% positive)
- You need HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keap | Less Annoying CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.8% | 5% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.4% | down−1.9% |
| Rank in CRM | #36 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keap −0.30000000000000004pp · Less Annoying CRM −1.9000000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Less Annoying CRM leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keap | Less Annoying CRM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which CRM offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #7 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keap | Less Annoying CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud (hosted on AWS) |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | — | HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | 24/7 chat support, U.S.-based phone support, Dedicated Customer Success Manager, Help center | Email, Phone, Help center, Free coaching calls |
| Founded | 2001 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Chandler, Arizona, United States | St. Louis, Missouri |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Debt | Grant (Arch Grants) |
| Best for | Growth-focused small businesses such as consultants, marketing agencies, coaches and startups that want marketing and sales automation | Small businesses and solo users who have outgrown a spreadsheet but want a simple CRM. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keap
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
- Lower effective monthly cost when paying annually
- Suited to growing teams needing workflow automation, custom sales pipelines and advanced reporting
Less Annoying CRM
- Straightforward pricing without a complicated tier structure
- Best for absolute simplicity and solopreneurs
- Simple contact and lead management with fewer unnecessary features
- Highest average user-review rating of 4.86/5
- Ease of use and transparent pricing
- Rating based on only 57 reviews
- Less advanced automation than rivals
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keap vs Less Annoying CRM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keap-vs-less-annoying-crm, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.