KeapSmall business CRM and automation platform
vs
MoEngageReinventing Lifecycle Marketing and Digital Experiences with AI
Comparison · Email Marketing · weekly run Nov 2
Keap vs MoEngage
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Keap is the stronger AI pick in Email Marketing: it has a visibility score of 0 versus 0 for MoEngage.
Choose Keap if…
- You need more native integrations (5000+ vs 300+)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
- Lower effective monthly cost when paying annually
Choose MoEngage if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or CSA STAR or ISO 27701 or ISO 22301 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Keap | MoEngage |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Email Marketing | #49 | #53 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keap 0pp · MoEngage 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Keap leads on 0 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
KeapMoEngage
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Keap ranked higher
0MoEngage ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keap | MoEngage |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud | — |
| Integrations | 5000+ | 300+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, CSA STAR, ISO 27701, ISO 22301 |
| Support | 24/7 chat support, U.S.-based phone support, Dedicated Customer Success Manager, Help center | — |
| Founded | 2001 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Chandler, Arizona, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Debt | Round led by Steadview Capital |
| Best for | Growth-focused small businesses such as consultants, marketing agencies, coaches and startups that want marketing and sales automation | Marketing and product teams at consumer brands that run personalized campaigns across channels |
Plans side by side
MoEngage
GrowthCustombased on Monthly Tracked Users (MTUs)
EnterpriseCustombased on Monthly Tracked Users (MTUs)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keap
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
- Lower effective monthly cost when paying annually
- Suited to growing teams needing workflow automation, custom sales pipelines and advanced reporting
MoEngage
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keap vs MoEngage”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keap-vs-moengage, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.