LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
TodoistA to-do list to organize your work and life
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Linear vs Todoist
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 3.3 for Todoist.
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 3.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 33% positive)
- You need GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
Choose Todoist if…
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $10)
- best for lightweight personal task tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Linear | Todoist |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.9% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #12 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Linear 0pp · Todoist 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinearTodoist
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Linear ranked higher
0Todoist ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Linear | Todoist |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States | Cloud-hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Integrations | — | 90+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) | Help center |
| Founded | 2019 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Palo Alto, California |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $134M raised | Grant |
| Best for | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system | Individuals and teams that want a simple, shared to-do list and task manager |
Plans side by side
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Todoist
Beginner$0free
Pro$5per month, billed yearly
Business$8per user/month, billed yearly
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Todoist
- best for lightweight personal task tracking
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Todoist”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-todoist, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.