Skip to content
SlateIndex
OneflowSmart contracts that feel like magic.
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Oneflow vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Oneflow is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 16.1 versus 10.7 for Responsive, and ranks ahead in 44% of the answers that name both.

Choose Oneflow if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.1 vs 10.7)
  • You need ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
  • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
  • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth

Choose Responsive if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 32% positive)
  • You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Oneflow Responsive
Visibility score16.1%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#7#10
Share of voice4.9%4%
Mentions this run2720
Positive in AI answers32%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Oneflow 16%

Oneflow 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Oneflow leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
3%
AI Mode
10.2%
15.7%
Perplexity
36.3%
13.3%
OneflowResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

9 engine answers name both brands

4Oneflow ranked higher
5Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOneflowResponsive
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$10,000 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentSaaSFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
SupportDedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tierProfessional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20122015
HeadquartersStockholm, SwedenFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingPrivate investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias StåhlgrenRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forTeams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contractsDedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

Oneflow

Pricing not available.

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Oneflow

  • Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
  • Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
  • Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
  • Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
  • Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
  • Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
  • Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams

Responsive

  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses
  • Top pick for RFP response management
  • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
  • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Oneflow vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/oneflow-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.