OutplayThe all-in-one sales stack for new-age teams.
vs
WoodpeckerCold email and LinkedIn outreach with high deliverability
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Outplay vs Woodpecker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Woodpecker is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 0.7 for Outplay.
Choose Outplay if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- transparent pricing
Choose Woodpecker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 0.7)
- You need GDPR 100% compliant (vendor claim) or CCPA 100% compliant (vendor claim) or ISO certified storage or CASA certified: tier 2 coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Outplay | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.7% | up+2.1% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #39 | #21 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Outplay +0.7pp · Woodpecker +2.1pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Woodpecker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OutplayWoodpecker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Outplay ranked higher
0Woodpecker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Outplay | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | GDPR 100% compliant (vendor claim), CCPA 100% compliant (vendor claim), ISO certified storage, CASA certified: tier 2 |
| Support | Chat support, Dedicated success manager (Enterprise plan) | Chat in the bottom right corner of the app, Book a call, Answers to questions within hours |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Wilmington, Delaware, US | Wroclaw, Poland |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Majority stake acquired by JungleWorks · $9M raised | Pre-seed agreement with Xevin Lab (amount not stated) · $0M raised |
| Best for | Sales teams of all sizes, especially growing SMBs that want enterprise-level sales engagement at a lower price. | Businesses that do outbound, including B2B sales teams, SaaS businesses and marketing or lead generation agencies |
Plans side by side
Outplay
Free Forever$0free forever
Starter$39month, billed annually
Growth$89user per month, billed annually
Enterprise$139user per month, billed annually
Woodpecker
EmailCustommonth
MultichannelCustommonth
LinkedInCustommonth
ScaleCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Outplay
- transparent pricing
Woodpecker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Outplay vs Woodpecker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outplay-vs-woodpecker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.