Outreach vs Zendesk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 55.1 versus 0.4 for Zendesk, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Outreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.1 vs 0.4)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
Choose Zendesk if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (34% vs 28% positive)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27018:2019 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 27017:2015 or ISO 42001:2023 or FedRAMP LI-SaaS or Cyber Essentials Plus coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Industry leader in omnichannel customer support
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Outreach | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 55.1% | 0.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−20.3% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #2 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 10.1% | 0.1% |
| Mentions this run | 61 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 28% | 34% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Outreach −20.300000000000004pp · Zendesk +0.10000000000000003pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Outreach | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a sales engagement platform integrate with? | Perplexity | #10 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Outreach | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 1800+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27018:2019, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 27017:2015, ISO 42001:2023, FedRAMP LI-SaaS, Cyber Essentials Plus |
| Support | Plus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding | Help Center, Community, Partners |
| Founded | 2014 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series G · $489M raised | Take-private (Hellman & Friedman, Permira) |
| Best for | Revenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform. | Support teams from startups to enterprises that need omnichannel ticketing with AI automation |
Plans side by side
Outreach
Zendesk
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Outreach
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
- Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
- Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
- Quote-based pricing with no public prices
- Heavy and complex, slow to configure
- Annual contracts with minimum seat counts
Zendesk
- Industry leader in omnichannel customer support
- Scalable platform for large enterprise teams
- Mature ticketing operations and SLA management
- Extensive marketplace and broad integrations
- Free trial available for 14 days
- Heavy, slow deployment compared with lighter tools
- High per-agent costs
- AI add-ons billed separately on top of base fee
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Outreach vs Zendesk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outreach-vs-zendesk, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.