ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
vs
SigneasySign effortlessly, manage contracts intelligently.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Responsive vs Signeasy
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 0.7 for Signeasy.
Choose Responsive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 0.7)
- You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Signeasy if…
- You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $10,000)
- You need ESIGN & UETA or eIDAS or SOC 2 or HIPAA or 21 CFR Part 11 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Responsive | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.7% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #10 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 4% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 20 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Responsive 0pp · Signeasy 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ResponsiveSigneasy
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Responsive ranked higher
0Signeasy ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Responsive | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $10,000 / mo | $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Flexible hosting options | Web, mobile and API |
| Integrations | 32+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 | ESIGN & UETA, eIDAS, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, 21 CFR Part 11 |
| Support | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions | Email support, Chat support, Priority support, Dedicated success manager |
| Founded | 2015 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Frisco, Texas, United States | Dallas, Texas |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round led by Elevate Capital | Series B |
| Best for | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. | Teams that need eSignatures together with a contract repository and renewal tracking, such as finance, HR, sales, legal operations and IT. |
Plans side by side
Responsive
Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Signeasy
Personal$10month/seat
Business$20month/seat
Business Pro$30month/seat
Build Your Plan (eSign)Customcustom
ICM Core$45month/seat, minimum 3 seats
ICM Pro$60month/seat, minimum 3 seats
Build Your Plan (ICM)Customcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
Signeasy
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Responsive vs Signeasy”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/responsive-vs-signeasy, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.