Responsive vs Tribble
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 1.5 for Tribble, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Responsive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 1.5)
- You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Tribble if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Responsive | Tribble |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.7% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #10 | #29 |
| Share of voice | 4% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 20 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Responsive 0pp · Tribble 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Responsive | Tribble |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #8 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Responsive | Tribble |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $10,000 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Flexible hosting options | Web app, Slack and Microsoft Teams |
| Integrations | 32+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions | Customer success team |
| Founded | 2015 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Frisco, Texas, United States | Los Angeles, CA |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round led by Elevate Capital | Seed (Crew Capital) |
| Best for | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. | Proposal, security and sales teams that answer RFPs, DDQs, security questionnaires and buyer questions from one set of approved answers. |
Plans side by side
Responsive
Tribble
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
Tribble
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Responsive vs Tribble”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/responsive-vs-tribble, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.