Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
BrazeBe Absolutely Engaging.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Braze
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Braze is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 9.2 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Braze if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.2 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Braze |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 9.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 3.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 19 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Braze 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Braze leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnBraze
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
2Braze ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | Braze |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #3 |
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Braze |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | 24x7x365 customer support, Braze Bonfire community network, Strategic advisors and technical architects |
| Founded | 2008 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | New York City, New York, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | IPO |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Companies at every stage of growth, from startups launching their first engagement programs to large global enterprises. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Braze
- Real-time, mobile-first, cross-channel consumer engagement
- Strong fit for high-volume B2C engagement at scale
- Best for enterprise and app-driven brands
- Placed among the stronger enterprise options by Gartner and Forrester coverage
- Better avoided without complex workflows, large customer volume, and dedicated marketing-ops support
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Braze”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-braze, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.