Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
MailerLiteDigital marketing tools to grow your audience faster and drive revenue smarter.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs MailerLite
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
MailerLite is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 6.1 versus 1 for Act-On.
Choose Act-On if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose MailerLite if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.1 vs 1)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (63% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or GDPR compliant coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | MailerLite |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 6.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #18 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 63% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · MailerLite 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
MailerLite leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnMailerLite
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
0MailerLite ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | MailerLite |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Free; paid from $12 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, GDPR compliant |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | 24/7 live chat, Email support, Knowledge base, Webinars |
| Founded | 2008 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | San Francisco, California, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Seed, led by Vantera VC |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Creators, solopreneurs and small teams, plus busy marketers with several revenue streams who want email, sales and automation in one tool. |
Plans side by side
MailerLite
Free$0month
Comfort$12month (starting price, scales with subscribers)
Power$25month (starting price, scales with subscribers)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
MailerLite
- clean, user-friendly interface and ease of use
- clear, transparent pricing
- generous permanent free tier
- cost-effective, good budget option
- strong Mailchimp replacement for small businesses
- free tier smaller with subscriber and send limits
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs MailerLite”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-mailerlite, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.