Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 12.2 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.2 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 33% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 12.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #9 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 3.8% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 22 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Make 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnMake
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Act-On ranked higher
0Make ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #17 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | — | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | — |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-make, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.