Skip to content
SlateIndex
Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2

Act-On vs Make

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Make is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 12.2 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Act-On if…

  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

Choose Make if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.2 vs 1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 33% positive)
  • You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
  • Free tier with 1,000 credits per month

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Act-On Make
Visibility score1%12.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Marketing Automation#31#9
Share of voice0.5%3.8%
Mentions this run322
Positive in AI answers33%41%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Act-On 1%

Act-On 0pp · Make 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Make leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
19.4%
AI Mode
1.1%
3%
Perplexity
0%
14.3%
Act-OnMake

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Act-On ranked higher
0Make ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAct-OnMake
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry price$900 / mo—
Free planNo—
Deployment—Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS
Integrations—3500+
Compliance—GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001
SupportStandard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for EnterpriseHelp center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans
Founded20082012
HeadquartersPortland, Oregon, United StatesPrague, Czech Republic
Employees201–500201–500
FundingRound of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised—
Best forMidsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices.Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide.

Plans side by side

Act-On

Professional$900month (2,500 active contacts/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Act-On pricing

Make

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Act-On

  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

    Make

    • Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
    • Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
    • Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
    • Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
    • Built-in AI agents for business workflows

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-make, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.