Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
ZapierBuild and scale AI workflows and agents across 9,000+ apps
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Zapier
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Zapier is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 12.1 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 29% positive)
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Zapier if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.1 vs 1)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 12.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Zapier 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Zapier leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnZapier
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Act-On ranked higher
0Zapier ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #19 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Free; paid from $19.99 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Multi-tenant cloud |
| Integrations | — | 9000+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Email support, Live chat on Professional plans from the 2,000 task tier, Priority support on Team and Enterprise, Technical Account Manager on set thresholds or as an add-on |
| Founded | 2008 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Equity crowdfunding |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Businesses from first-time founders to the Fortune 500 that want AI and automation across many apps. |
Plans side by side
Zapier
Free$0month
Professional$19.99month (starting from)
Team$69month (starting from)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Zapier
- Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps
- Powerful AI agent and workflow automation
- Strong user ratings on G2 and Capterra
- Widely adopted general integration and workflow tool
- Free tier with no time limit or credit card needed
- Free plans have limited monthly activities
- Not a standalone marketing automation platform
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Zapier”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-zapier, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.