Skip to content
SlateIndex
Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
ZapierBuild and scale AI workflows and agents across 9,000+ apps
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2

Act-On vs Zapier

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Zapier is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 12.1 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Act-On if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 29% positive)
  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

Choose Zapier if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.1 vs 1)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Act-On Zapier
Visibility score1%12.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Marketing Automation#31#10
Share of voice0.5%4%
Mentions this run323
Positive in AI answers33%29%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Act-On 1%

Act-On 0pp · Zapier 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Zapier leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
16.1%
AI Mode
1.1%
6.3%
Perplexity
0%
13.9%
Act-OnZapier

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Act-On ranked higher
0Zapier ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAct-OnZapier
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry price$900 / moFree; paid from $19.99 / mo
Free planNoYes
Deployment—Multi-tenant cloud
Integrations—9000+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CCPA
SupportStandard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for EnterpriseEmail support, Live chat on Professional plans from the 2,000 task tier, Priority support on Team and Enterprise, Technical Account Manager on set thresholds or as an add-on
Founded20082011
HeadquartersPortland, Oregon, United StatesSan Francisco, CA
Employees201–500501–1,000
FundingRound of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raisedEquity crowdfunding
Best forMidsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices.Businesses from first-time founders to the Fortune 500 that want AI and automation across many apps.

Plans side by side

Act-On

Professional$900month (2,500 active contacts/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Act-On pricing

Zapier

Free$0month
Professional$19.99month (starting from)
Team$69month (starting from)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Zapier pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Act-On

  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

    Zapier

    • Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps
    • Powerful AI agent and workflow automation
    • Strong user ratings on G2 and Capterra
    • Widely adopted general integration and workflow tool
    • Free tier with no time limit or credit card needed
    • Free plans have limited monthly activities
    • Not a standalone marketing automation platform

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Zapier”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-zapier, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.