Apollo vs Klenty
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Apollo is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 51 versus 9.4 for Klenty, and ranks ahead in 84% of the answers that name both.
Choose Apollo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (51 vs 9.4)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 21% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage
Choose Klenty if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR-compliant coverage
- multi-channel outreach automation
- AI-powered follow-up automation
- lower cost option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Apollo | Klenty |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 51% | 9.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.8% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #4 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 9.4% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 59 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | 21% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Apollo −2.799999999999997pp · Klenty −0.9000000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Apollo leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
19 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Apollo | Klenty |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a sales engagement platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #5 | #6 |
| How do I choose a sales engagement platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #3 | #4 |
| What are the best Sales Engagement tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #3 | #5 |
| Top sales engagement platform options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #3 | #8 |
| Top sales engagement platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #3 | #7 |
| Compare the leading Sales Engagement platforms | Perplexity | #5 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular sales engagement platform | ChatGPT | #3 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular sales engagement platform | Perplexity | #3 | #6 |
| Best sales engagement platform with AI features | Perplexity | #4 | #5 |
| Most affordable sales engagement platform that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #1 | #11 |
| How much does a sales engagement platform cost per month? | ChatGPT | #2 | #4 |
| Which sales engagement platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #1 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Apollo | Klenty |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $50 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud platform | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR-compliant |
| Support | Email support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions | 24/5 dedicated support, Help documentation |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Palo Alto, California, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $250M raised | Seed · $16M raised |
| Best for | Sales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one system | Phone-first SDR teams that run high-volume outbound calling and multi-channel cadences |
Plans side by side
Klenty
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Apollo
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
- Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
- Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
- Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
- Widely used and highly rated by reviewers
Klenty
- multi-channel outreach automation
- AI-powered follow-up automation
- lower cost option
- clear public pricing
- free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs Klenty”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-klenty, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.