Skip to content
SlateIndex
AvomaAI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching
vs
OutreachAgentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2

Avoma vs Outreach

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 0.4 for Avoma, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Avoma if…

  • You need ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or GDPR or HIPAA (Enterprise plan) coverage
  • free view-only and collaborator seats

Choose Outreach if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 0.4)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (28% vs 25% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Avoma Outreach
Visibility score0.4%8%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Sales Enablement#39#12
Share of voice0.2%2.3%
Mentions this run113
Positive in AI answers25%28%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Avoma 0%

Avoma 0pp · Outreach 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.3%
5%
AI Mode
0%
6.3%
Perplexity
0%
12.8%
AvomaOutreach

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Avoma ranked higher
0Outreach ranked higher
PromptEngineAvomaOutreach
What should a sales enablement platform integrate with? ChatGPT#6#7

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAvomaOutreach
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$19 per seat / moContact sales
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo
DeploymentCloud-hosted on AWS in the USA—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, GDPR, HIPAA (Enterprise plan)SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR
SupportSelf-service knowledge base, Live chat and email support, Customer Success Manager, Shared Slack channelPlus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding
Founded20172014
HeadquartersPalo Alto, California, USSeattle, Washington
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingSeries A · $15M raisedSeries G · $489M raised
Best forCustomer-facing sales, success and marketing teams at startups and scaleupsRevenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform.

Plans side by side

Avoma

Startup$19recorder seat/month, billed annually ($29 billed monthly)
Organization$29recorder seat/month, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
Enterprise$39recorder seat/month, billed annually only
Avoma pricing

Outreach

Amplify EssentialsCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify CoreCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify PlusCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify ProCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Outreach pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Avoma

  • free view-only and collaborator seats
  • per-seat pricing for recorder seats

Outreach

  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
  • Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
  • Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
  • Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
  • Quote-based pricing with no public prices
  • Heavy and complex, slow to configure
  • Annual contracts with minimum seat counts

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Avoma vs Outreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/avoma-vs-outreach, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.