CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
KlentySales engagement platform for phone-first SDR teams
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Klenty
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Klenty is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 9.4 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $50)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 21% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
Choose Klenty if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.4 vs 2.8)
- You need GDPR-compliant coverage
- multi-channel outreach automation
- AI-powered follow-up automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Klenty |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 9.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 21% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Klenty −0.9000000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Klenty leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseKlenty
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Close ranked higher
1Klenty ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Close | Klenty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which sales engagement platform has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #3 | #5 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #9 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Klenty |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | $50 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud-based |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR-compliant |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | 24/5 dedicated support, Help documentation |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Palo Alto, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | Seed · $16M raised |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Phone-first SDR teams that run high-volume outbound calling and multi-channel cadences |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Klenty
Starter$50month, billed annually
Growth$70user/month, billed annually
Plus$99user/month, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Klenty
- multi-channel outreach automation
- AI-powered follow-up automation
- lower cost option
- clear public pricing
- free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Klenty”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-klenty, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.