CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
lemlistThe only platform you need for outbound
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs lemlist
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
lemlist is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 12.9 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $69)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 58+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 34% positive)
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
Choose lemlist if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.9 vs 2.8)
- Strong cold email deliverability
- Personalized outbound and multichannel campaigns
- Free trial available
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | lemlist |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 12.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−1% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 3.8% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 25 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 34% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · lemlist −1pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
lemlist leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Closelemlist
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
2lemlist ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Close | lemlist |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Sales Engagement tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #9 | #6 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #9 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | lemlist |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | $69 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | 58+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | In-app live support, 1:1 onboarding sessions, Dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Priority support (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2013 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Paris, France |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Angel | Secondary growth equity (Expedition Growth Capital, shares bought from existing shareholders) |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Sales and growth teams running outbound, from solo founders and agencies to scaling sales teams |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
lemlist
Email$69month (unlimited users, 50,000 emails/mo); $55/month billed yearly
Multichannel$109user / month; $87/user/month billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
lemlist
- Strong cold email deliverability
- Personalized outbound and multichannel campaigns
- Free trial available
- Good value for multichannel outbound
- Intuitive interface with high user ratings
- More focused on outbound email than complete sales-process management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs lemlist”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-lemlist, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.