Skip to content
SlateIndex
DocuSignBringing Agreements to Life
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

DocuSign vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

DocuSign is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 21.9 versus 10.7 for Responsive, and ranks ahead in 90% of the answers that name both.

Choose DocuSign if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.9 vs 10.7)
  • You want a lower entry price ($11 vs $10,000)
  • You need more native integrations (1000+ vs 32+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (34% vs 33% positive)

Choose Responsive if…

  • You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric DocuSign Responsive
Visibility score21.9%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#6#10
Share of voice6.2%4%
Mentions this run3320
Positive in AI answers34%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2DocuSign 22%

DocuSign 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

DocuSign leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
35.7%
3%
AI Mode
13.7%
15.7%
Perplexity
16.3%
13.3%
DocuSignResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

10 engine answers name both brands

9DocuSign ranked higher
1Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDocuSignResponsive
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$11 per seat / mo$10,000 / mo
Free planNoNo
Deployment—Flexible hosting options
Integrations1000+32+
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, CSA STAR, APEC PPP, SSAE 18GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
Support24/7 live technical support on Enhanced plans, Docusign Support portalProfessional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20032015
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees5,000+501–1,000
FundingInitial public offering · $500M raisedRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forIndividuals and small to medium teams that need e-signature, and enterprises that need centralized agreement management with IAM.Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

DocuSign

Personal$11month, billed annually
Standard$30user/month, billed annually
Business Pro$45user/month, billed annually
Enhanced plansCustomcontact sales
DocuSign pricing

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

DocuSign

  • Strong integration with enterprise tools
  • Recommended as best enterprise agreement infrastructure via DocuSign CLM
  • Best-known choice for electronic signatures
  • Large customer base and wide worldwide use
  • Good fit for organisations already invested in DocuSign

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “DocuSign vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/docusign-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.