Skip to content
SlateIndex
FullStoryIntelligent digital experiences. Powered by human context.
vs
HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3

FullStory vs Heap

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Heap is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 36.1 versus 9.1 for FullStory, and ranks ahead in 81% of the answers that name both.

Choose FullStory if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (19% vs 15% positive)
  • You need SOC 3 or ISO 42001 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
  • session replay and UX friction analysis

Choose Heap if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (36.1 vs 9.1)
  • You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric FullStory Heap
Visibility score9.1%36.1%
Change vs last weekup+0.1%up+9.1%
Rank in Product Analytics#9#4
Share of voice3.8%11.1%
Mentions this run1952
Positive in AI answers19%15%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3FullStory 9%

FullStory +0.1999999999999993pp · Heap +9.100000000000001pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.8%
43%
AI Mode
5.4%
31.3%
Perplexity
14.1%
34.1%
FullStoryHeap

Head to head in AI answers

16 engine answers name both brands

3FullStory ranked higher
13Heap ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionFullStoryHeap
Pricing modelFlat tiersUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesContact sales
Free planYesYes
Deployment—Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site
Integrations—100+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018
SupportOnboarding with Fullstory specialists, Professional services: Insights+ consulting and Data+ configuration, Advantage Subscription expert guidanceEmail support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community
Founded2014—
HeadquartersAtlanta, GA, United States—
Employees501–1,000—
FundingSeries C (one source: $32M led by Stripes)Series D · $205M raised
Best forProduct, UX, and growth teamsProduct and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging

Plans side by side

FullStory

FullstoryFree$0month
BusinessCustom
AdvancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
FullStory pricing

Heap

Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Heap pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

FullStory

  • session replay and UX friction analysis
  • combines quantitative and qualitative data
  • digital experience intelligence and qualitative debugging
  • frequently recommended by analysts and industry lists
  • useful heatmaps and session recordings

    Heap

    • Automatic event capture (autocapture)
    • Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
    • Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
    • Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
    • Free tier available
    • Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
    • Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “FullStory vs Heap”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fullstory-vs-heap, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.