Skip to content
SlateIndex
GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
UmamiOpen-source web and product analytics
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2

Glassbox vs Umami

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Umami is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 8.4 versus 4.4 for Glassbox.

Choose Glassbox if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 67% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context

Choose Umami if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.4 vs 4.4)
  • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics
  • Free hosted tier or free self-hosted option
  • Affordable and reliable web analytics

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Glassbox Umami
Visibility score4.4%8.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Web Analytics#17#11
Share of voice1.2%2.3%
Mentions this run612
Positive in AI answers83%67%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Glassbox 4%

Glassbox 0pp · Umami 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Umami leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.8%
13.9%
AI Mode
3.7%
4.1%
Perplexity
4.6%
7.2%
GlassboxUmami

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Glassbox ranked higher
0Umami ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGlassboxUmami
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $20 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentSingle-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud.Self-hosted on your own infrastructure or as Umami Cloud, with US and EU regions
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1—
Support—Community support, Email support, Email and chat support, Uptime SLA, onboarding assistance and designated support engineer on Enterprise
Founded20102022
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees201–5001–10
FundingMinority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raisedPre-seed · $2M raised
Best forHighly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance.Developers, marketers, agencies, startups and teams that want privacy-first analytics without a cookie banner

Plans side by side

Glassbox

Pricing not available.

Umami

Hobby$0month
Pro$20month
Business$200month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Umami pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Glassbox

  • Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
  • Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
  • Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
  • Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
  • Highest review rating among established web analytics tools

    Umami

    • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics
    • Free hosted tier or free self-hosted option
    • Affordable and reliable web analytics
    • Simple to use for everyday traffic reporting
    • Strong choice for self-hosting and control

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Umami”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-umami, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.