Icertis vs Responsive
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Icertis if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
Choose Responsive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 3.3)
- You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Icertis | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 10.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #23 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 20 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Icertis 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Responsive leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Icertis | Responsive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #1 | #8 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #9 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Icertis | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $10,000 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Public or private cloud | Flexible hosting options |
| Integrations | — | 32+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 |
| Support | — | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions |
| Founded | 2009 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Frisco, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt | Round led by Elevate Capital |
| Best for | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. |
Plans side by side
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Responsive
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Icertis vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icertis-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.