Skip to content
SlateIndex
IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Icertis vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Icertis if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence

Choose Responsive if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 3.3)
  • You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Icertis Responsive
Visibility score3.3%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#23#10
Share of voice0.9%4%
Mentions this run520
Positive in AI answers40%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Icertis 3%

Icertis 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Responsive leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
6.7%
3%
AI Mode
3.1%
15.7%
Perplexity
0%
13.3%
IcertisResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Icertis ranked higher
1Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIcertisResponsive
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$10,000 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentPublic or private cloudFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPAGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
Support—Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20092015
HeadquartersBellevue, WA, United StatesFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees1,001–5,000501–1,000
FundingRound from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debtRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forLarge global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contractsDedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

Icertis

Pricing not available.

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Icertis

  • Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
  • Handles complex commercial management
  • Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
  • Suited to large multinational enterprises

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Icertis vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icertis-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.