OutreachAgentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Outreach vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Outreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 1.5)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 28% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Outreach | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 8% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #12 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 28% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Outreach 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OutreachQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Outreach ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Outreach | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Plus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series G · $489M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Revenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Outreach
Amplify EssentialsCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify CoreCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify PlusCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify ProCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Outreach
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
- Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
- Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
- Quote-based pricing with no public prices
- Heavy and complex, slow to configure
- Annual contracts with minimum seat counts
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Outreach vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outreach-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.