Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
MailchimpTurn ideas into emails & SMS that connect
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Mailchimp
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mailchimp is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 17.8 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Mailchimp if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.8 vs 1)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EU-US Data Privacy Framework coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Mailchimp |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 17.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 4.8% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 35% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Mailchimp 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mailchimp leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnMailchimp
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
1Mailchimp ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | Mailchimp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Mailchimp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Free; paid from $13 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Integrations | — | 300+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, EU-US Data Privacy Framework |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Phone and priority support on Premium, 24/7 email and chat support on Standard and Essentials, Email support for the first 30 days on Free, Guides and tutorials |
| Founded | 2008 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Atlanta, Georgia, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | — |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Growing businesses, including small businesses, retailers, nonprofits and creators that want email, SMS and automation in one platform |
Plans side by side
Mailchimp
Premium$350month (starting price, based on contacts)
Standard$20month (starting price, based on contacts)
Essentials$13month (starting price, based on contacts)
Free$0month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Mailchimp
- Easy to use, beginner-friendly
- Drag-and-drop email design and templates
- Most popular, widely recognised market leader
- Strongest overall general-purpose choice
- Free tier and broad integrations
- Tight free plan limits
- No standard annual billing discount
- Penalises cold lists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Mailchimp”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-mailchimp, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.