Clay vs Yesware
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Clay is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.9 versus 1.8 for Yesware, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Clay if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.9 vs 1.8)
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Yesware if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $167)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Basic email tracking, templates, and campaigns inside Gmail or Outlook
- Free-forever tier
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Yesware |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | down−0.6% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #25 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay −1.5000000000000004pp · Yesware −0.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Clay leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Clay | Yesware |
|---|---|---|---|
| Most affordable sales engagement platform that is still reliable | Perplexity | #9 | #5 |
| Which sales engagement platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #13 | #11 |
| Is there a free sales engagement platform for small teams? | Perplexity | #7 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Yesware |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Gmail Chrome extension and Outlook add-in, cloud-hosted on Amazon Web Services and Heroku |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Email support, Phone support on Pro and above, Help Center, Weekly webinar trainings |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Saskatoon, SK, Canada |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Funding round · $48M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Individual sellers, sales teams and SMBs that sell through email and want simple tools without enterprise overhead |
Plans side by side
Clay
Yesware
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Yesware
- Basic email tracking, templates, and campaigns inside Gmail or Outlook
- Free-forever tier
- Offers a free tier
- Suited to individual reps or very small teams
- Likely cheaper for solo operators
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Yesware”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-yesware, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.