Skip to content
SlateIndex
CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
OutreachAgentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3

Close vs Outreach

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 55.1 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.

Choose Close if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 28% positive)
  • You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
  • Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing

Choose Outreach if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.1 vs 2.8)
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Close Outreach
Visibility score2.8%55.1%
Change vs last weekdown−0.6%down−20.3%
Rank in Sales Engagement#26#2
Share of voice1%10.1%
Mentions this run661
Positive in AI answers52%28%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Close 3%

Close −0.5pp · Outreach −20.300000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
58.9%
AI Mode
3.9%
63%
Perplexity
2.6%
43.5%
CloseOutreach

Head to head in AI answers

4 engine answers name both brands

1Close ranked higher
3Outreach ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCloseOutreach
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$19 per seat / moContact sales
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)—
Integrations100+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPASOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR
SupportKnowledge base, Email supportPlus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding
Founded20132014
HeadquartersAustin, Texas, United StatesSeattle, Washington
Employees51–200501–1,000
FundingAngelSeries G · $489M raised
Best forFounders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMSRevenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform.

Plans side by side

Close

Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Close pricing

Outreach

Amplify EssentialsCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify CoreCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify PlusCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify ProCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Outreach pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Close

  • Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
  • Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
  • All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
  • Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
  • Frequently included in CRM shortlists

    Outreach

    • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
    • Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
    • Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
    • Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
    • Quote-based pricing with no public prices
    • Heavy and complex, slow to configure
    • Annual contracts with minimum seat counts

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Outreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-outreach, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.