CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
YeswareSales engagement software that works inside Gmail and Outlook
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Yesware
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 1.8 for Yesware.
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 1.8)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 33% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
Choose Yesware if…
- You want a free plan to start
- Basic email tracking, templates, and campaigns inside Gmail or Outlook
- Free-forever tier
- Offers a free tier
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Yesware |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−0.6% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Yesware −0.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseYesware
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0Yesware ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Yesware |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Gmail Chrome extension and Outlook add-in, cloud-hosted on Amazon Web Services and Heroku |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Email support, Phone support on Pro and above, Help Center, Weekly webinar trainings |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Saskatoon, SK, Canada |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | Funding round · $48M raised |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Individual sellers, sales teams and SMBs that sell through email and want simple tools without enterprise overhead |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Yesware
Free$0seat / month
Pro$19seat / month, billed monthly
Premium$45seat / month, billed monthly
Enterprise$85seat / month, billed monthly
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Yesware
- Basic email tracking, templates, and campaigns inside Gmail or Outlook
- Free-forever tier
- Offers a free tier
- Suited to individual reps or very small teams
- Likely cheaper for solo operators
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Yesware”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-yesware, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.