Conga CPQ vs Responsive
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Choose Responsive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 0.3)
- You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CPQ | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 10.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #44 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 20 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CPQ 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Conga CPQ | Responsive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #12 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CPQ | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $10,000 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application | Flexible hosting options |
| Integrations | — | 32+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 |
| Support | — | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas | Frisco, Texas, United States |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Round led by Elevate Capital |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise buyers | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. |
Plans side by side
Conga CPQ
Pricing not available.
Responsive
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CPQ vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-cpq-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.