Skip to content
SlateIndex
DialpadThe AI platform for customer experience
vs
UJETAI-Powered Cloud Contact Center Platform
Comparison · Contact Center · weekly run Nov 3

Dialpad vs UJET

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Dialpad is the stronger AI pick in Contact Center: it has a visibility score of 14.5 versus 0.8 for UJET, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Dialpad if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.5 vs 0.8)
  • You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $65)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA-ready (Business Associate Agreement available) or GDPR (Data Processing Agreement available) or CSA STAR registry member or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27017:2015 or ISO 27018:2019 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

Choose UJET if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 45% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 or HIPAA or PCI coverage
  • Highly rated on G2, around 4.7/5
  • People-centric, conversation-driven customer service approach

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Dialpad UJET
Visibility score14.5%0.8%
Change vs last weekup+4%down−1.8%
Rank in Contact Center#11#37
Share of voice3.9%0.4%
Mentions this run222
Positive in AI answers45%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Dialpad 15%

Dialpad +4pp · UJET −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Dialpad leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
13.1%
1%
AI Mode
16.1%
1.3%
Perplexity
14.3%
0%
DialpadUJET

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Dialpad ranked higher
0UJET ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDialpadUJET
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$15 per seat / mo$65 per seat / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo
DeploymentCloud-basedCloud-native SaaS
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, HIPAA-ready (Business Associate Agreement available), GDPR (Data Processing Agreement available), CSA STAR registry member, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27017:2015, ISO 27018:2019SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI
Support24/7 phone support on Advanced and Premium plans, Enterprise SLA on Premium plans, Help center at help.dialpad.comStandard Support, Premium Support
Founded20112015
HeadquartersSan Ramon, CaliforniaSan Francisco, California
Employees1,001–5,000201–500
FundingSeries FSeries D
Best forBusinesses that run customer support, sales, and team communications and want AI agents and human agents on one platform.Organizations of any size that want AI built into their contact center, including enterprises with premium brands to protect.

Plans side by side

Dialpad

Support Essentials$89user/month
Support Advanced$119user/month
Support Premium$149user/month
Sell Essentials$39user/month
Sell Advanced$59user/month
Sell Premium$79user/month
Connect Standard$15user/month
Connect Pro$25user/month
Connect EnterpriseCustom
Resolve (Agentic AI)Customconversation-based
Dialpad pricing

UJET

Basic$65user/month
Pro$99user/month
Enterprise$120user/month
Digital$69user/month
UJET pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Dialpad

  • Built-in AI tools such as real-time transcription, agent assist and coaching
  • Budget-friendly entry pricing for business calling and contact center plans
  • AI embedded as core infrastructure rather than an expensive add-on tier
  • Quick setup and self-service sign-up, suited to smaller teams
  • Unified calling, video meetings and support queues in one ecosystem
  • Dedicated AI Contact Center pricing may require a sales conversation
  • Exact annual commitment discount percentage not publicly specified

UJET

  • Highly rated on G2, around 4.7/5
  • People-centric, conversation-driven customer service approach
  • Close contender for best-reviewed contact center platform

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Dialpad vs UJET”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/dialpad-vs-ujet, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.