HiverThe agentic omnichannel customer service platform built for complex support.
vs
tawk.toOne free inbox for all your customer channels.
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3
Hiver vs tawk.to
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
tawk.to is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 27.6 versus 0.7 for Hiver, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Hiver if…
- You need more native integrations (1000+ vs 50+)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or CCPA or HIPAA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Turns shared Gmail and Outlook inboxes into collaborative help desks
Choose tawk.to if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (27.6 vs 0.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (70% vs 18% positive)
- You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF or Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or ICO (UK) registration or GDPR compliance coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Hiver | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 27.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.7% | down−4.3% |
| Rank in Live Chat & AI Support | #34 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 7.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 34 |
| Positive in AI answers | 18% | 70% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hiver +0.7pp · tawk.to −4.299999999999997pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
tawk.to leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Hivertawk.to
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Hiver ranked higher
2tawk.to ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Hiver | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Live Chat & AI Support tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #14 | #6 |
| Best live chat tool with AI features | Perplexity | #6 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hiver | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $25 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS); runs inside Gmail or as a standalone web application | — |
| Integrations | 1000+ | 50+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, CCPA, HIPAA | EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, ICO (UK) registration, GDPR compliance |
| Support | 24/7 email support, 24/7 chat support, Free data migration | 24x7-365 live support, Help Center at help.tawk.to, Email support@tawk.to |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, California, United States | Las Vegas, Nevada, US |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $30M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Support teams handling complex, cross-team requests, including teams that work from Gmail | Businesses of any size that want free live chat with unlimited team members and no per-seat fees. |
Plans side by side
Hiver
Growth$25user/month (billed annually; $35 monthly)
Pro$55user/month (billed annually; $65 monthly)
Elite$85user/month (billed annually; $95 monthly)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hiver
- Turns shared Gmail and Outlook inboxes into collaborative help desks
- Good fit for small and midsize email-first support teams on Gmail or Google Workspace
- Described as a good customer support platform
- Described as a unique tool
tawk.to
- Completely free core live chat
- Unlimited agents and chats on free tier
- Widely used, high-volume live chat tool
- Good value for budget-conscious small teams
- Highly rated by users on review sites
- Tawk.to branding on widget unless paid
- Limited advanced automation and reporting on free plan
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hiver vs tawk.to”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hiver-vs-tawk-to, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.