Skip to content
SlateIndex
HiverThe agentic omnichannel customer service platform built for complex support.
vs
tawk.toOne free inbox for all your customer channels.
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3

Hiver vs tawk.to

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

tawk.to is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 27.6 versus 0.7 for Hiver, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Hiver if…

  • You need more native integrations (1000+ vs 50+)
  • You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or CCPA or HIPAA coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Turns shared Gmail and Outlook inboxes into collaborative help desks

Choose tawk.to if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (27.6 vs 0.7)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (70% vs 18% positive)
  • You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF or Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or ICO (UK) registration or GDPR compliance coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Hiver tawk.to
Visibility score0.7%27.6%
Change vs last weekup+0.7%down−4.3%
Rank in Live Chat & AI Support#34#6
Share of voice0.4%7.1%
Mentions this run234
Positive in AI answers18%70%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Hiver 1%

Hiver +0.7pp · tawk.to −4.299999999999997pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

tawk.to leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
25.6%
AI Mode
0%
29.4%
Perplexity
2.2%
27.8%
Hivertawk.to

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

0Hiver ranked higher
2tawk.to ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionHivertawk.to
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$25 per seat / moContact sales
Free planNo · 7-day trialYes
DeploymentCloud (SaaS); runs inside Gmail or as a standalone web application—
Integrations1000+50+
ComplianceGDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, CCPA, HIPAAEU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, ICO (UK) registration, GDPR compliance
Support24/7 email support, 24/7 chat support, Free data migration24x7-365 live support, Help Center at help.tawk.to, Email support@tawk.to
Founded20112012
HeadquartersSan Jose, California, United StatesLas Vegas, Nevada, US
Employees201–500201–500
FundingSeries B · $30M raisedSeries B
Best forSupport teams handling complex, cross-team requests, including teams that work from GmailBusinesses of any size that want free live chat with unlimited team members and no per-seat fees.

Plans side by side

Hiver

Growth$25user/month (billed annually; $35 monthly)
Pro$55user/month (billed annually; $65 monthly)
Elite$85user/month (billed annually; $95 monthly)
Hiver pricing

tawk.to

Free$0forever
tawk.to pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Hiver

  • Turns shared Gmail and Outlook inboxes into collaborative help desks
  • Good fit for small and midsize email-first support teams on Gmail or Google Workspace
  • Described as a good customer support platform
  • Described as a unique tool

    tawk.to

    • Completely free core live chat
    • Unlimited agents and chats on free tier
    • Widely used, high-volume live chat tool
    • Good value for budget-conscious small teams
    • Highly rated by users on review sites
    • Tawk.to branding on widget unless paid
    • Limited advanced automation and reporting on free plan

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hiver vs tawk.to”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hiver-vs-tawk-to, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.