HiverThe agentic omnichannel customer service platform built for complex support.
vs
HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
Comparison · Help Desk · weekly run Nov 3
Hiver vs HubSpot
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Help Desk: it has a visibility score of 26.5 versus 1.9 for Hiver, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Hiver if…
- You need GDPR or ISO 27001 or CCPA or HIPAA coverage
- Turns shared Gmail and Outlook inboxes into collaborative help desks
- Good fit for small and midsize email-first support teams on Gmail or Google Workspace
- Described as a good customer support platform
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (26.5 vs 1.9)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 1000+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 18% positive)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Hiver | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 26.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.9% | up+1.9% |
| Rank in Help Desk | #22 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 36 |
| Positive in AI answers | 18% | 35% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Hiver +0.9999999999999999pp · HubSpot +1.8000000000000007pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HiverHubSpot
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Hiver ranked higher
3HubSpot ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Hiver | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies resolve customer tickets without a dedicated tool? | Perplexity | #3 | #2 |
| Alternatives to the most popular help desk platform | AI Mode | #7 | #2 |
| Official website of the top help desk platform vendors | ChatGPT | #17 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Hiver | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $25 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | — | $3,000 |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS); runs inside Gmail or as a standalone web application | Cloud |
| Integrations | 1000+ | 2000+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, CCPA, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | 24/7 email support, 24/7 chat support, Free data migration | Phone |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, California, United States | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B · $30M raised | Corporate round |
| Best for | Support teams handling complex, cross-team requests, including teams that work from Gmail | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. |
Plans side by side
Hiver
Growth$25user/month (billed annually; $35 monthly)
Pro$55user/month (billed annually; $65 monthly)
Elite$85user/month (billed annually; $95 monthly)
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Hiver
- Turns shared Gmail and Outlook inboxes into collaborative help desks
- Good fit for small and midsize email-first support teams on Gmail or Google Workspace
- Described as a good customer support platform
- Described as a unique tool
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hiver vs HubSpot”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hiver-vs-hubspot, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.