Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
CreatioAI CRM and workflow platform for people and AI agents
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Creatio
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Act-On is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.6 for Creatio, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.6)
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Creatio if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- low-code process automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Creatio |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #35 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 45% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Creatio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Act-On leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnCreatio
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Act-On ranked higher
1Creatio ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | Creatio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #10 |
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #7 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Creatio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Support plans, Academy, Partner network |
| Founded | 2008 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Series D (unconfirmed) · $268M raised |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Mid-size and enterprise organizations, especially in financial services, wanting CRM with no-code workflow and AI agents |
Plans side by side
Creatio
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Creatio
- low-code process automation
- workflow automation combined with CRM
- best for agile process-driven enterprises
- configurable workflows and process automation
- accessible composable pricing bundling workflow and CRM
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Creatio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-creatio, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.