Skip to content
SlateIndex
HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
vs
UmamiOpen-source web and product analytics
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2

Heap vs Umami

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Umami is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 8.4 versus 3.3 for Heap, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Heap if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)
  • Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
  • Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation

Choose Umami if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.4 vs 3.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 15% positive)
  • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics
  • Free hosted tier or free self-hosted option

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Heap Umami
Visibility score3.3%8.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Web Analytics#20#11
Share of voice1.8%2.3%
Mentions this run912
Positive in AI answers15%67%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Heap 3%

Heap 0pp · Umami 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Umami leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
13.9%
AI Mode
3%
4.1%
Perplexity
5%
7.2%
HeapUmami

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

2Heap ranked higher
0Umami ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionHeapUmami
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $20 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the siteSelf-hosted on your own infrastructure or as Umami Cloud, with US and EU regions
Integrations100+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018—
SupportEmail support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap CommunityCommunity support, Email support, Email and chat support, Uptime SLA, onboarding assistance and designated support engineer on Enterprise
Founded—2022
Headquarters—San Francisco, CA, United States
Employees—1–10
FundingSeries D · $205M raisedPre-seed · $2M raised
Best forProduct and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event taggingDevelopers, marketers, agencies, startups and teams that want privacy-first analytics without a cookie banner

Plans side by side

Heap

Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Heap pricing

Umami

Hobby$0month
Pro$20month
Business$200month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Umami pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Heap

  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)
  • Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
  • Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
  • Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
  • Free tier available
  • Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
  • Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions

Umami

  • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics
  • Free hosted tier or free self-hosted option
  • Affordable and reliable web analytics
  • Simple to use for everyday traffic reporting
  • Strong choice for self-hosting and control

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heap vs Umami”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heap-vs-umami, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.