Skip to content
SlateIndex
IntercomThe only helpdesk designed for the AI Agent era
vs
LiveAgentHelp desk and live chat with AI agents
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3

Intercom vs LiveAgent

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Intercom is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 46.2 versus 8.5 for LiveAgent, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.

Choose Intercom if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (46.2 vs 8.5)
  • You need more native integrations (450+ vs 200+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 39% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 or ISO 27701 or AIUC-1 or CCPA coverage

Choose LiveAgent if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $29)
  • Strong ticketing and help-desk depth
  • Fast implementation with multi-channel routing and live chat
  • 30-day free trial without a credit card

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Intercom LiveAgent
Visibility score46.2%8.5%
Change vs last weekup+2%down−1.5%
Rank in Live Chat & AI Support#2#10
Share of voice10.1%2.7%
Mentions this run4814
Positive in AI answers41%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Intercom 46%

Intercom +1.9000000000000057pp · LiveAgent −1.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Intercom leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
61.1%
3.5%
AI Mode
41.5%
2.8%
Perplexity
36.1%
19.3%
IntercomLiveAgent

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

6Intercom ranked higher
1LiveAgent ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIntercomLiveAgent
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$29 per seat / mo$15 per seat / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo · 30-day trial
DeploymentCloud (SaaS), with US, EU and AU data hostingCloud only
Integrations450+200+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 27701, AIUC-1, GDPR, CCPAGDPR
Support—24/7 AI chatbot with human escalation, Email support, In-app live chat (Mon–Fri), Dedicated account manager (Business from 20 agents, Enterprise)
Founded20112004
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesBratislava, Slovakia
Employees1,001–5,00051–200
FundingDebt financing · $242M raisedBootstrapped
Best forSupport teams from startups to large enterprises that want AI-first customer service with human agents and an AI agent in one systemSmall and growing support teams that want email, chat, phone and social in one inbox

Plans side by side

Intercom

Essential$29seat/mo
Advanced$85seat/mo
Expert$132seat/mo
Fin AI Agent (with existing helpdesk)$0.99Fin outcome
Intercom pricing

LiveAgent

Starter$15agent/month, billed monthly (offer; regular $19)
Team$26agent/month, billed monthly (offer; regular $35)
Business$44agent/month, billed monthly (offer; regular $59)
Enterprise$3,999month, flat fee, 80 agents included, billed monthly
LiveAgent pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Intercom

  • AI-first customer support with the Fin AI agent
  • Strong for in-app messaging and product-led SaaS
  • Unified conversation history for smooth handoffs to humans
  • Lower per-seat cost when billed annually
  • Praised as the best overall chat and AI experience
  • Per-seat and usage-based AI charges can add up in cost

LiveAgent

  • Strong ticketing and help-desk depth
  • Fast implementation with multi-channel routing and live chat
  • 30-day free trial without a credit card
  • Good value as a budget help desk
  • Chat and ticketing in one suite

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Intercom vs LiveAgent”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/intercom-vs-liveagent, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.