Skip to content
SlateIndex
FullStoryIntelligent digital experiences. Powered by human context.
vs
UmamiOpen-source web and product analytics
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2

FullStory vs Umami

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Umami is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 8.4 versus 4.6 for FullStory, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.

Choose FullStory if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
  • session replay and UX friction analysis

Choose Umami if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.4 vs 4.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 19% positive)
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric FullStory Umami
Visibility score4.6%8.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Web Analytics#16#11
Share of voice1.8%2.3%
Mentions this run1012
Positive in AI answers19%67%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2FullStory 5%

FullStory 0pp · Umami 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Umami leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.3%
13.9%
AI Mode
1.3%
4.1%
Perplexity
9.1%
7.2%
FullStoryUmami

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

1FullStory ranked higher
2Umami ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionFullStoryUmami
Pricing modelFlat tiersUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $20 / mo
Free planYesYes
Deployment—Self-hosted on your own infrastructure or as Umami Cloud, with US and EU regions
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001—
SupportOnboarding with Fullstory specialists, Professional services: Insights+ consulting and Data+ configuration, Advantage Subscription expert guidanceCommunity support, Email support, Email and chat support, Uptime SLA, onboarding assistance and designated support engineer on Enterprise
Founded20142022
HeadquartersAtlanta, GA, United StatesSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees501–1,0001–10
FundingSeries C (one source: $32M led by Stripes)Pre-seed · $2M raised
Best forProduct, UX, and growth teamsDevelopers, marketers, agencies, startups and teams that want privacy-first analytics without a cookie banner

Plans side by side

FullStory

FullstoryFree$0month
BusinessCustom
AdvancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
FullStory pricing

Umami

Hobby$0month
Pro$20month
Business$200month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Umami pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

FullStory

  • session replay and UX friction analysis
  • combines quantitative and qualitative data
  • digital experience intelligence and qualitative debugging
  • frequently recommended by analysts and industry lists
  • useful heatmaps and session recordings

    Umami

    • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics
    • Free hosted tier or free self-hosted option
    • Affordable and reliable web analytics
    • Simple to use for everyday traffic reporting
    • Strong choice for self-hosting and control

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “FullStory vs Umami”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fullstory-vs-umami, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.