Skip to content
SlateIndex
IntercomThe only helpdesk designed for the AI Agent era
vs
tawk.toOne free inbox for all your customer channels.
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3

Intercom vs tawk.to

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Intercom is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 46.2 versus 27.6 for tawk.to, and ranks ahead in 76% of the answers that name both.

Choose Intercom if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (46.2 vs 27.6)
  • You need more native integrations (450+ vs 50+)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 or ISO 27701 or AIUC-1 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

Choose tawk.to if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (70% vs 41% positive)
  • You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF or Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or ICO (UK) registration or GDPR compliance coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Intercom tawk.to
Visibility score46.2%27.6%
Change vs last weekup+2%down−4.3%
Rank in Live Chat & AI Support#2#6
Share of voice10.1%7.1%
Mentions this run4834
Positive in AI answers41%70%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Intercom 46%

Intercom +1.9000000000000057pp · tawk.to −4.299999999999997pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Intercom leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
61.1%
25.6%
AI Mode
41.5%
29.4%
Perplexity
36.1%
27.8%
Intercomtawk.to

Head to head in AI answers

17 engine answers name both brands

13Intercom ranked higher
4tawk.to ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIntercomtawk.to
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$29 per seat / moContact sales
Free planNo · 14-day trialYes
DeploymentCloud (SaaS), with US, EU and AU data hosting—
Integrations450+50+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 27701, AIUC-1, GDPR, CCPAEU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, UK Extension to the EU-U.S. DPF, Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, ICO (UK) registration, GDPR compliance
Support—24x7-365 live support, Help Center at help.tawk.to, Email support@tawk.to
Founded20112012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesLas Vegas, Nevada, US
Employees1,001–5,000201–500
FundingDebt financing · $242M raisedSeries B
Best forSupport teams from startups to large enterprises that want AI-first customer service with human agents and an AI agent in one systemBusinesses of any size that want free live chat with unlimited team members and no per-seat fees.

Plans side by side

Intercom

Essential$29seat/mo
Advanced$85seat/mo
Expert$132seat/mo
Fin AI Agent (with existing helpdesk)$0.99Fin outcome
Intercom pricing

tawk.to

Free$0forever
tawk.to pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Intercom

  • AI-first customer support with the Fin AI agent
  • Strong for in-app messaging and product-led SaaS
  • Unified conversation history for smooth handoffs to humans
  • Lower per-seat cost when billed annually
  • Praised as the best overall chat and AI experience
  • Per-seat and usage-based AI charges can add up in cost

tawk.to

  • Completely free core live chat
  • Unlimited agents and chats on free tier
  • Widely used, high-volume live chat tool
  • Good value for budget-conscious small teams
  • Highly rated by users on review sites
  • Tawk.to branding on widget unless paid
  • Limited advanced automation and reporting on free plan

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Intercom vs tawk.to”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/intercom-vs-tawk-to, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.